header-logo header-logo

31 January 2014
Issue: 7593 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Mesothelioma exemption lost

PI lawyers slam government's u-turn

Personal injury lawyers have slated the government’s U-turn on mesothelioma.

The government has decided to revoke the exemption of mesothelioma claims from the success fees and after-the-event (ATE) premium elements of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO).

A Ministry of Justice consultation last year asked whether ss 44 and 46 of LASPO should be brought into force for claims for mesothelioma claims—a life-threatening lung disease caused by contact with asbestos. Ministers have now decided to remove the exemption.

Opposition MPs criticised the decision during a Commons debate on mesothelioma this week, and claimant lawyers have also expressed disapproval.  

Matthew Stockwell, president of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL), says: “It’s impossible to rationalise why dying people should have to pay for the inherent risks of pursuing redress, when they certainly never asked to be in a position where they need compensation.

“Mesothelioma claimants know they are going to die, and they know they have to race against the clock when they make a claim. They are simply trying to make their last few months more bearable, and to ensure that their families will have some security when they’re gone. If ever a claimant needed full compensation, it is surely the claimant facing a death sentence just because he turned up for work."

 

Issue: 7593 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll