header-logo header-logo

07 August 2014
Issue: 7618 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Mergers: is there safety in numbers?

Research illustrates rising trend for law firm mergers over past year

Mergers between law firms have soared 65% in the past year.

Some 385 mergers took place in 2013, up from 234 in 2012, according to accountants Wilkins Kennedy, as the legal sector consolidated to save on costs. Larger firms snapped up smaller players to make themselves more profitable and combat increased competition from other legal services, providers, the accountancy firm said.

For example, last year Norton Rose merged with US firm Fulbright & Jaworski in June; Wragge & Co merged with City firm Lawrence Graham in May; and Manches joined Penningtons in October, after Manches ran into difficulties. By comparison, there were just 146 mergers in the same 12-month period five years ago.

Tommy White, partner at Wilkins Kennedy, says: “These figures show that the rising trend for mergers shows no signs of slowing down, as financial pressures, increased competition, and to a perhaps lesser extent regulatory issues, are still having a major impact.

“M&A, corporate finance and property work for lawyers, particularly in the south of the country are all recovering but are generally still below the heady days of pre-2007. In addition the long term, secular decline in litigation work continues—despite a helping hand from recession linked disputes. While some firms need to find a white knight quickly in order to stave off potential financial collapse, others are turning to mergers to deliver that boost in profitability that a merger will achieve from cost savings. Economies of scale from a merger—especially where the merged firms can better utilise staffing levels—can be substantial.”

White says there has also been an increase in mergers aimed at gaining access to new sectors and services or to achieve wider exposure overseas. “The drive for consolidation appears to be more, not less, pressing as we leave recession behind,” he says.

Smaller firms, in particular, are under pressure from measures such as the ban on referral fees for personal injury cases, changes to legal aid and conditional fee arrangements as well as increased competition following the liberalisation of the legal services market, he adds.

Issue: 7618 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll