header-logo header-logo

Mental Health

04 April 2014
Issue: 7601 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

TW v Enfield Borough Council [2014] EWCA Civ 362, [2014] All ER (D) 292 (Mar)

As a matter of construction of s 11(4) of the Mental Health Act 1983, when an approved social worker was considering whether it was “reasonably practicable” to consult the nearest relative before making an application to admit a mental patient pursuant to the 1983 Act, the section imposed on the social worker an obligation to strike a balance between the patient’s rights under Art 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights not to be detained unless that was done by a procedure that was in accordance with the law and the patient’s rights under Art 8 to his private life. A patient’s assertion, even if founded on fact and even if reasonable, that consultation would lead to an infringement of her rights under art 8 of the Convention could not, as a matter of law, lead automatically to the conclusion that it was “not reasonably practicable” to consult the “nearest relative”. Nor was an approved social worker’s conclusion that such consultation would lead to an infringement of the patient’s Art 8

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll