header-logo header-logo

06 January 2011 / David Burrows
Issue: 7447 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Meet the new FPR!

Part one: David Burrows offers some preliminary thoughts on the Family Proceedings Rules 2010

At the tail end of last year—a good time to bury bad news—a new set of family proceedings rules, Family Proceedings Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), were laid before Parliament (SI 2010/2955). They are due to come into operation on 6 April 2011.

These rules have been anticipated since Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (CPR 1998) hit the book stands in late 1998; and they have been in MoJ gestation for five years and more. The resources put into their delivery would be risible; save that they relate to a very important subject for those affected: children and some of the poorer members of society, who are now—in addition—likely to be without legal aid (to add legal aid insult to the injury of the convoluted new rules).

The committee which drafted these rules faced an almost insuperable task. They tried to comprise a substantial array of procedural, jurisdictional, case management and evidential facets to very diverse sets of family proceedings in at least three sets of courts. Inevitably this has obscured

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll