header-logo header-logo

24 April 2008
Issue: 7318 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Mediation , Family
printer mail-detail

Mediation remodelled

In Brief

The Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution’s Model Mediation Agreement has been revised in a bid to reflect mediation’s increased integration into regular litigation practice. Under the new standard procedure, parties will still share mediator costs equally, but parties will be able to claim mediation expenses as costs in the case if the matter goes to trial. The rules on mediation confidentiality have also been tightened meaning the fact that mediation takes place is not confidential, unless the parties choose otherwise. Additionally, the mediator’s liability is now limited to cases of fraudulent acts or omissions, or those involving wilful misconduct. In the old agreement, a mediator was liable only if shown “to have acted in bad faith”.

Issue: 7318 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Mediation , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll