header-logo header-logo

28 February 2014 / Richard Harrison
Issue: 7596 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Mediation: one size fits all?

web_harrison_0

Richard Harrison addresses some fundamentals of the mediation process

The last redoubt of oratory and rhetoric in legal practice is now to be found in the opening plenary sessions of mediation.

The emotional appeal to the jury to give the poor defendant a chance is now firmly in the past. The magnificent cadences of final speeches in civil claims are rarely heard.

But a day’s mediation is traditionally commenced by a roundtable get-together where the spokesperson for each party gets the chance to put the case at its absolute highest and tell the other side about how dreadfully they have been advised by their own lawyers. This is one chance to wheel out the old advocacy skills.

I have therefore set out to produce a uniform “one size fits all” speech for the busy mediation participant who wants maximum effect from minimum effort. Some may say this is indeed empty rhetoric: I could not possibly comment. I follow it up with a template address from the mediator on the physiological challenges of the day ahead.

Advocate’s effort

Advocate (looking opponent’s client directly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll