header-logo header-logo

28 February 2014 / Richard Harrison
Issue: 7596 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Mediation: one size fits all?

web_harrison_0

Richard Harrison addresses some fundamentals of the mediation process

The last redoubt of oratory and rhetoric in legal practice is now to be found in the opening plenary sessions of mediation.

The emotional appeal to the jury to give the poor defendant a chance is now firmly in the past. The magnificent cadences of final speeches in civil claims are rarely heard.

But a day’s mediation is traditionally commenced by a roundtable get-together where the spokesperson for each party gets the chance to put the case at its absolute highest and tell the other side about how dreadfully they have been advised by their own lawyers. This is one chance to wheel out the old advocacy skills.

I have therefore set out to produce a uniform “one size fits all” speech for the busy mediation participant who wants maximum effect from minimum effort. Some may say this is indeed empty rhetoric: I could not possibly comment. I follow it up with a template address from the mediator on the physiological challenges of the day ahead.

Advocate’s effort

Advocate (looking opponent’s client directly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll