header-logo header-logo

05 July 2024 / David Burrows
Issue: 8078 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Family , Mediation , Child law
printer mail-detail

Mediation: 50 years after Finer

180621
How is the law serving single parents & their children? David Burrows considers a half-century of reforms
  • The 1974 Finer report of the Committee on One-Parent Families aimed to improve the lives of single parents and their children.
  • This article considers the report’s recommendations and the legislative reforms that have taken place since—in particular, the court’s powers to order parties to engage in mediation.

It is June as I write; and finally, after 50 years and more, mediation is ‘busting out all over’, including in the Court of Appeal and in the Family Division. How did we get here? Why has it taken so long since the first Finer report thoughts of ‘conciliation’ in 1974 and the first conciliation service in Bristol in the late 1970s? And what of those 50 years since 1974?

On 2 July 1974, the report of the Committee on One-Parent Families, July 1974, Cmnd 5629, chaired by Sir Morris Finer, was published. Its recommendations were designed to alter for the better the lives of single parents (then proportionally many more women than men)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll