header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
15 October 2019 / David Locke
Issue: 7860 / Categories: Features , Profession , Mediation , ADR , Health & safety , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

Mediating medical disputes

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
Far from a flash in the pan, support for mediation in health sector disputes is on the rise, reports David Locke
  • Mediation is becoming an increasingly popular option in medical disputes, including in clinical negligence and withdrawal of treatment cases.

In his 2010 speech to the Civil Mediation Council National Conference, Lord Neuberger, then Master of the Rolls, emphasised the role of mediation as a new mechanism for resolving disputes, albeit not one which was intended to replace other established forms of alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Even then he was very evidently a firm, if not devout, believer in the power of mediation. It would seem his faith deepened, and almost exactly five years later, once again delivering a lecture to the same body, he recalled how mediation had initially been perceived as a ‘trendy’ idea without substance, and even in 2015 still had a credibility gap with some practitioners. However, Lord Neuberger suggested his audience should ‘be pretty uninhibited about supporting the idea of mediation in civil and family disputes’.

A human story

Four years on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll