header-logo header-logo

01 February 2007 / William Gibson
Issue: 7258 / Categories: Features , Costs , Fees
printer mail-detail

Mediate—or pay the price

A hike in court fees would encourage more mediation in costs disputes, reports William Gibson

There are rumours on the grapevine that the percentage-based court fee for costs assessments will return. Before April 1999 there was a major incentive for parties in litigation to settle the resulting costs claim by negotiation or mediation. Referring the matter to court for adjudication on a fair and reasonable costs figure attracted a taxing fee of 7.5% of the total value of the bill, half of which was paid in advance when the papers were lodged in court.

The Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), surprisingly, abolished this lucrative source of revenue and replaced it with a flat fee, originally £160 in the High Court, currently £600. Suddenly bills in seven-figure amounts, which would have attracted an additional payment in excess of £75,000 to have a court assessment, could go through the same process for a nominal sum. Now, when even cases which settle before action can have costs-only proceedings and assessments, costs judges are again fully occupied. A

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll