header-logo header-logo

16 January 2024
Issue: 8055 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Family
printer mail-detail

Media in the family courts

The family court reporting pilot, which began in Carlisle, Cardiff and Leeds a year ago, will be rolled out to a further 16 courts at the end of January

The Transparency Implementation Group Reporting Pilot (TIG) creates a presumption that accredited media can attend and report on proceedings in family courts, subject to rules on anonymity. It has led to coverage of public and private law cases in newspapers and a mini-series on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.

Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division, said extending the pilot was ‘a huge step in the judiciary’s ongoing work to increase transparency’.

The 16 courts are: Liverpool, Manchester, West Yorkshire, Kingston-upon-Hull, Nottingham, Stoke, Derby, Birmingham, Central Family Court, East London, West London, Dorset, Truro, Luton, Guildford and Milton Keynes.

The Law Society expressed support for the pilot extension.

Issue: 8055 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll