header-logo header-logo

04 August 2011 / Michael Cook
Issue: 7477 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

The meat in the sandwich

Michael Cook is hungry for all fast-track costs to be fixed

Fixed fast-track costs were a basic tenet of the Woolf reforms but they were introduced for fast-track trials only. That is unsurprising. Lord Woolf’s Access to Justice report contained a suggested costs scale or matrix, taking into account the weight and complexity of the case and the stage it had reached, which was met with almost universal condemnation. Various pilot schemes threw out widely-differing results, serving only to highlight the difficulty in obtaining the necessary data and translating it into a regime of fixed costs for an as yet unknown practice and procedure. The lord chancellor therefore postponed the introduction of fixed fast-track pre-trial costs until the fast-track had been running long enough for the amount of work involved in it to be ascertained and evaluated.

It has now been running for 14 years. The certainty of fixed costs was at the heart of Lord Woolf’s proposals, although the costs must of course be fixed at the right level and regularly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll