header-logo header-logo

04 August 2011 / Michael Cook
Issue: 7477 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

The meat in the sandwich

Michael Cook is hungry for all fast-track costs to be fixed

Fixed fast-track costs were a basic tenet of the Woolf reforms but they were introduced for fast-track trials only. That is unsurprising. Lord Woolf’s Access to Justice report contained a suggested costs scale or matrix, taking into account the weight and complexity of the case and the stage it had reached, which was met with almost universal condemnation. Various pilot schemes threw out widely-differing results, serving only to highlight the difficulty in obtaining the necessary data and translating it into a regime of fixed costs for an as yet unknown practice and procedure. The lord chancellor therefore postponed the introduction of fixed fast-track pre-trial costs until the fast-track had been running long enough for the amount of work involved in it to be ascertained and evaluated.

It has now been running for 14 years. The certainty of fixed costs was at the heart of Lord Woolf’s proposals, although the costs must of course be fixed at the right level and regularly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll