header-logo header-logo

30 April 2015
Issue: 7650 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The meaning of “penalty”

A parking charge for overstayers is not a “penalty” and therefore enforceable, the Court of Appeal has held.

In Parkingeye v Beavis [2015] EWCA Civ 402, Beavis was charged £85 after overstaying in a free car park. Parkingeye brought small claims proceedings when Beavis did not pay.

The court rejected Beavis’ arguments that the charge was a penalty and therefore unenforceable at common law, and was unfair and therefore unenforceable under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999.

Delivering his judgment, Sir Timothy Lloyd said that an intention to deter was not enough to make the charge a penalty: “The term must in itself amount to something which is extravagant and unconscionable if it is to be found invalid under the rules about contractual penalties.” However, he said the charge would have been a penalty if it had been “grossly disproportionate”.

Issue: 7650 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll