header-logo header-logo

30 April 2015
Issue: 7650 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The meaning of “penalty”

A parking charge for overstayers is not a “penalty” and therefore enforceable, the Court of Appeal has held.

In Parkingeye v Beavis [2015] EWCA Civ 402, Beavis was charged £85 after overstaying in a free car park. Parkingeye brought small claims proceedings when Beavis did not pay.

The court rejected Beavis’ arguments that the charge was a penalty and therefore unenforceable at common law, and was unfair and therefore unenforceable under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999.

Delivering his judgment, Sir Timothy Lloyd said that an intention to deter was not enough to make the charge a penalty: “The term must in itself amount to something which is extravagant and unconscionable if it is to be found invalid under the rules about contractual penalties.” However, he said the charge would have been a penalty if it had been “grossly disproportionate”.

Issue: 7650 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll