header-logo header-logo

09 May 2019 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7839 / Categories: Features , Defamation , Technology , Media
printer mail-detail

Mean screen libel machine

Social media has added a whole new dimension to the challenges of determining the meaning of words, says Athelstane Aamodt

  • The social media user represents a new class of ‘ordinary reader’ to consider when determining the true meaning of statements.
  • Should social media companies be subject to regulation enforcing a legal duty of care on them with respect to their users?

Much of the practice of law is about determining the meanings of words. In some cases, for example, the focus will be on what a law is meant to mean, and in others the focus will be on what agreements made between parties are meant to mean. The area of law that is concerned perhaps more than any other about what words mean is defamation. The reason for this is obvious: for a statement to be capable of being defamatory, a court must first determine what the words actually mean.

Taking stock

The process of how courts decide what a statement means was the focus of the recent Supreme Court decision in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll