header-logo header-logo

25 February 2011 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7454 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

McKenzie Friends United

Peter Thompson QC fights the corner of a tried & trusted friend

McKenzie Friends are in trouble. They may not yet have read the new Practice Guidance on the subject that was issued by the master of the rolls and the president of the Family Division last July; but when they do they will see that they need to smarten up their act and perhaps create their own website!

For a reminder of their humble origins we must turn back to the speech of Lord Tenterden CJ in Collier v Hicks [1831] 2 B & Ad 663: “Any person, whether he be a professional man (or woman) or not, may attend as the friend of either party, may take notes, may quietly make suggestions, and give advice; but no one can demand to take part in the proceedings as an advocate, contrary to the regulations of the court.” The text was adopted with approval by the Court of Appeal in McKenzie v McKenzie [1970] 3 All ER 1034. As a result, litigants in person frequently bring a McKenzie, a family friend or trusted neighbour

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll