header-logo header-logo

12 December 2018
Issue: 7821 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

May vote brings more chaos

PM stands ready to deliver on Brexit, if she gets backing in leadership campaign

Britain faced yet more Brexit woes this week as Conservative MPs attempted to trigger a leadership contest less than four months before Exit Day.

The required 48 letters were sent this week amid a wave of fury that Prime Minister Theresa May postponed the House of Commons vote on her Brexit deal. May said she stood ‘ready to finish the job’.

Meanwhile, calls for a second referendum escalated after the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that the UK can unilaterally revoke its Art 50 notification of intention to withdraw from the EU. The ruling, in Wightman & Ors v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU (Case C-621/18), backs Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona’s Advisory Opinion last week.

The ECJ rejected the arguments of the Council of Ministers and European Commission that the consent of all the other Member States was required for revocation. It ruled that the UK can choose to stay in the EU at any time while the treaties still apply, whether in the two-year period from official notification of Art 50 or in any extension of this period agreed with the European Council. The UK would need to make a decision to remain, taken in accord with our constitutional requirements and then duly notified to the President of the European Council.

Charles Brasted, partner at Hogan Lovells, said the ruling ‘put beyond doubt that, until the moment the UK signs a withdrawal agreement or leaves the EU with no deal on 29 March 2019, it can still stop Brexit, even in the face of opposition by the rest of the EU. 

‘If it did so, the UK could also retain its current terms of membership, including the “rebate” negotiated by Mrs Thatcher, and it would be under no obligation to join the Euro. It is important to note that the ruling only bites if the UK decides to cancel Brexit and the EU27 disagree.’

The judicial review was brought by a cross-party group of politicians and Jolyon Maugham QC, of Devereux Chambers.

Downing Street has responded that the ruling is hypothetical as the UK will not revoke Art 50.

Issue: 7821 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll