header-logo header-logo

10 December 2009 / Malcolm Skinner
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Matters of trust

The Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 2009, explained by Malcolm Skinner

With the advent of the Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 2009 there will be a collective sigh of relief from students .

Or will there be?

While the Act may have received Royal Assent, it still has to be implemented which is not likely to happen until after the middle of 2010 so we will have to continue with the old law for the time being.

The old law is contained in common law and in the Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 1964 (PAA 1964) and provides that a future interest must vest (to prevent it being perpetually  inalienable) at common law, within a life or lives in being at the date of the disposition plus 21 years and under the Act, within a period of up to 80 years as specified or 21 years in the case of an option in respect of land.

In respect of the accumulation of income the permitted periods are:
l the lifetime of the grantor/settler.
l 21 years from their death.
l the minority of person(s) living or en ventre sa mere at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll