header-logo header-logo

07 October 2010
Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Matrimonials: late answer

Is it necessary to obtain leave from the court to file an answer out of time where...

Is it necessary to obtain leave from the court to file an answer out of time where special procedure directions for trial have neither been given nor requested?

The time for filing an answer is specified by the Family Proceedings Rules 1991 (FPR)  r 2.12(1). This period may only be extended by agreement between the parties or by court order. FPR r 2.14 contains a general restriction which applies once directions for trial have been given, but it does not affect the time requirement in r 2.12. Accordingly, if there is no agreed extension, the court’s leave is required to file an answer out of time, even where directions for trial have not been given.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll