header-logo header-logo

07 February 2008 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7307 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Matched Pairs

Seamus Burns explores the legality of paired transplants

The announcement last October that two couples—Peter and Roma Horrell and an anonymous couple from Lothian—had participated in the first paired organ transplantation in the UK, heralds a welcome possible method for desperately ill patients receiving an organ in a transplantation system where demand for organs greatly exceeds the supply. Even though some 14.5 million people are registered with the NHS Organ Donor Register, UK Transplant, the organ matching and allocation organisation, estimates that more than 7,000 patients were listed as actively waiting for a transplant at the end of March 2007.

 
LEGALITY OF PAIRED TRANSPLANTS
The innovative practice of paired transplants is governed by the provisions of the Human Tissue Act 2004 (Persons who Lack Capacity to Consent and Transplants) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1659) (the regulations) which came into effect in September 2006. A paired donation is defined in the regulations and means an arrangement under which:
 
“(a) transplantable material is removed from a donor (D) for transplant to a person who is not genetically related or known to D, and
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll