header-logo header-logo

16 November 2022
Issue: 8003 / Categories: Legal News , Competition , Collective action
printer mail-detail

Mastercard's opt-out blocker fails

Mastercard has been refused permission to appeal the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) judgment greenlighting the claim in the mammoth class action launched by former Financial Ombudsman Walter Merricks.

The £14bn claim concerns multilateral interchange fees charged by Mastercard, which the European Commission later found breached competition law and resulted in higher prices for consumers. It is the first ‘opt-out’ case certified by the CAT, which means anyone who fulfils the criteria (over 16, UK domiciled between 1992 and 2008, and purchased from UK businesses that accepted Mastercard) is included unless they specifically opt out.

In a ruling handed down last week, the CAT refused permission on all four grounds, at [2022] CAT 50, on the basis the grounds advanced by Mastercard had no real prospect of success and raised no arguable point of law.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll