header-logo header-logo

23 August 2021
Issue: 7946 / Categories: Legal News , Collective action
printer mail-detail

‘Massive’ Mastercard class action given the green light

Mastercard has lost its bid to stop a gigantic £15bn class action going ahead, in a landmark decision on opt-out claims
The Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT), which acts as gatekeeper on such actions, gave permission this month for the first opt-out collective action to proceed, in Merricks v Mastercard [2021] CAT 28.

Under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 regime (amending the Competition Act 1998), collective proceedings for anti-competitive conduct can be brought on an opt-out basis, which means anyone who falls within the definition of the class is automatically a member unless they explicitly withdraw. However, claims must first be certified by the CAT in the form of a Collective Proceedings Order (CPO).

Ruling in Merricks, Mr Justice Roth and two judges noted ‘the present proceedings are one of the first brought under this statutory regime and, by any measure, amount to a massive claim.

‘The original claim form stated that the class comprised some 46.2 million people, comprising, in effect, everyone who purchased goods or services in the UK when he or she was resident in the UK and over 16 years of age between 1992 and 2008. It should be emphasised that the damages are calculated on all purchases made by members of the class from outlets that accepted Mastercard and are not confined to purchases made using a Mastercard credit or debit card.

‘The aggregate damages were broadly estimated at around £14 billion, including a substantial element of interest given the time since the alleged loss had been suffered.’

The case concerns multi-lateral interchange fees (MIFs) charged for transactions using Mastercard cards, which may have have led to consumers paying higher prices for goods and services.

Boris Bronfentrinker, partner, Quinn Emanuel, representing the applicant, Walter Merricks, said: ‘The tribunal’s judgment marks an important landmark in both the timeline of Mr Merricks’ case, and also in the development of the CPO regime more generally, being the first CPO ever to have been granted.

‘It has been a long and winding journey that started back in 2016. It is very satisfying to know that Mastercard must now defend on the merits a claim of £15bn in the knowledge that it has a binding finding of infringement against it. 

‘We now look forward to securing what should be the largest damages award in English history for the class of some 46 million UK consumers and to holding Mastercard to account for its anticompetitive behaviour.’

Merricks, a solicitor and former Chief Ombudsman of the Financial Ombudsman Service, said: ‘The tribunal’s ruling heralds the start of an era of consumer-focused class actions which will help to hold big business to account in areas that really matter, which is an area I have spent much of my working life fighting for and something which I am proud to be a part of.’

Issue: 7946 / Categories: Legal News , Collective action
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll