header-logo header-logo

29 January 2024
Issue: 8057 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Mediation
printer mail-detail

Mandatory mediation scrapped for separating couples

Ministers have scrapped plans for compulsory mediation and will pilot early legal advice instead—a decision welcomed by family lawyers

In its March 2023 consultation, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) proposed making mediation mandatory for separating couples prior to making a court application, supporting earlier resolution of private family law arrangements.

Issuing its official consultation response last week, however, the MoJ abandoned mandatory mediation and announced a pilot on legal advice specifically designed for parents and carers having difficulties agreeing their child arrangements.

The MoJ will also extend its private law Pathfinder pilot to South-East Wales and Birmingham, and roll it out to all courts nationally. Pathfinder, launched in 2022, facilitates information-sharing between police, local authorities, courts and other agencies, and it allows judges to request more documentation before a case gets to court.

Welcoming the about-turn, family lawyer and NLJ columnist David Burrows said: ‘To force parties to mediate is illogical.’

Peter Burgess, partner at Burgess Mee Family Law, welcomed the return of early legal advice, which, he says, ‘was swept away with the LASPO [Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012] reforms ten years ago.

‘Early legal advice has to be a vital part of keeping family conflicts out of court and easing the burden on judges, who often have to explain the law to litigants in person. It remains to be seen exactly how this scheme will be implemented or who will be eligible, and there will be a long, hard road ahead to rebuild a family justice system which is fit for purpose once more.’

Resolution committee member Jo Edwards, head of family at Forsters, said: ‘There is plenty of evidence to show the connection between couples receiving early legal advice and resolving issues on separation, in turn freeing up court time for the most needy cases (involving safeguarding issues or vulnerable people).

‘Mediation can be extremely effective, but it’s not right for every couple and works best when it is entered into voluntarily. The proposals also risked making victims of domestic abuse feel that they had no option but to go into mediation.’

Deborah Jeff, partner, Simkins, said: ‘It is eminently sensible that the government has listened to the feedback of solicitors and mediators. Parties must come to mediation feeling safe and with parity of power.’

Law Society vice president Richard Atkinson said: ‘Having the conversation early could mean a dispute is settled sooner.’

Issue: 8057 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Mediation
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll