26 April 2024 / Nicholas Dobson

Issue: 8068 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Equality

Malicious communications: what’s beyond the pale?

Exactly how thick-skinned do local politicians need to be? Nicholas Dobson looks at recent case law

For a conviction under s 1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1988, a message must not only be ‘grossly offensive’ but also intended to cause distress or anxiety to the recipient or (an)other(s).
Special tolerance may be required for speech on political issues.

Freedom of expression is ‘one of the essential foundations’ of a democratic society. Says who? The European Court of Human Rights, in Handyside v the United Kingdom (5493/72). So, Art 10(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights (incorporated into UK law by the Human Rights Act 1998) gives everyone the right to freedom of expression, subject to Art 10(2) restrictions as ‘prescribed by law’ and ‘necessary in a democratic society’ for (among other things) ‘the prevention of disorder or crime’ or ‘the protection of the reputation or rights of others’.

But what about potentially offensive or shocking speech? Handyside indicates that, subject to Art 10(2), the right to freedom of expression is applicable not only to information or ideas favourably

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Malicious communications: what’s beyond the pale?

Issue: 8068 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Equality

Exactly how thick-skinned do local politicians need to be? Nicholas Dobson looks at recent case law

For a conviction under s 1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1988, a message must not only be ‘grossly offensive’ but also intended to cause distress or anxiety to the recipient or (an)other(s).
Special tolerance may be required for speech on political issues.

But what about potentially offensive or shocking speech? Handyside indicates that, subject to Art 10(2), the right to freedom of expression is applicable not only to information

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal expands Midlands residential development team

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn adds employee benefits and executive compensation practice in London with partner Richard Surtees

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Laytons ETL appoints new partner and head of intellectual property disputes

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Property cases reshape established principles

A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land

NLJ this week: Stress ruling raises the bar for employers

Employers cannot rely on wellbeing services alone to defend workplace stress claims after a High Court decision awarding almost £1m to an overworked employee

NLJ this week: Can Manchesterism revive access to justice?

Andy Burnham's brand of 'Manchesterism' could offer fresh thinking on legal aid and access to justice if it reaches Westminster, according to Roger Smith, NLJ columnist and former director of JUSTICE

NLJ this week: Constitutional conventions tested as power changes hands

The constitutional fallout from a change of prime minister, rather than the politics, is under scrutiny as questions arise over the limits of executive authority in a leadership transition

NLJ this week: Lawyers must become product designers

The legal profession is undergoing a fundamental shift from selling services to creating technology-enabled products, according to Professor Luke Mason, Head of School of Law at Regent's University London

Error message

Malicious communications: what’s beyond the pale?

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron