header-logo header-logo

Making room for AI in arbitration

208708
As the EU Artificial Intelligence Act rolls out, Gustavo Moser sets out a practical checklist for managing AI usage in arbitration 
  • The EU AI Act introduces comprehensive compliance standards that will influence international arbitration practices.
  • Establishing robust arbitration agreements and procedural orders will serve as guardrails for arbitral proceedings, effectively communicating the ground rules for managing AI’s role within the arbitration landscape.
  • With penalties for non-compliance set to begin in August 2025, timely adaptation is imperative for maintaining the integrity of the arbitration process.

The EU Artificial Intelligence Act (the ‘AI Act’), which became law on 1 August 2024, established regulations that will reshape the landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) across various sectors, including international arbitration. Most provisions will apply from 2025/26.

As the EU moves forward with implementing this legislation, arbitration stakeholders must navigate its complexities and ensure compliance with the AI Act’s robust standards. While arbitrators may feel the most immediate impact, party counsel must also grasp the implications for their clients and the arbitration process.

Key provisions

It is important

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll