header-logo header-logo

10 July 2009 / Brent Mcdonald
Issue: 7377 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Personal injury , Employment
printer mail-detail

Making a connection

Smith has forced the courts to re-evaluate the concept of control,says Brent McDonald

In Smith v Northamptonshire County Council [2009] UKHL 27, ALL ER [2009] All ER (D) 170 (May) Mrs Smith was a carer and driver working for the defendant. On the day of her accident, as she had done for eight years previously, she attended at a private house to convey the occupant, who was a wheelchair user, into the minibus. To do so she had to wheel the claimant down a wooden ramp which had been installed at the client’s home by the NHS.

Although the council had carried out an inspection of the ramp (which, it was agreed, would not have revealed a defect) and asked Mrs Smith to visually inspect the ramp before using it, they had no right to call for its removal, to repair it or otherwise exercise control over it.

Due to rotting which could not be seen, the edge of the ramp gave way as the claimant crossed it, causing the claimant to fall and suffer injury. The claimant alleged a breach of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll