header-logo header-logo

10 July 2009 / Brent Mcdonald
Issue: 7377 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Personal injury , Employment
printer mail-detail

Making a connection

Smith has forced the courts to re-evaluate the concept of control,says Brent McDonald

In Smith v Northamptonshire County Council [2009] UKHL 27, ALL ER [2009] All ER (D) 170 (May) Mrs Smith was a carer and driver working for the defendant. On the day of her accident, as she had done for eight years previously, she attended at a private house to convey the occupant, who was a wheelchair user, into the minibus. To do so she had to wheel the claimant down a wooden ramp which had been installed at the client’s home by the NHS.

Although the council had carried out an inspection of the ramp (which, it was agreed, would not have revealed a defect) and asked Mrs Smith to visually inspect the ramp before using it, they had no right to call for its removal, to repair it or otherwise exercise control over it.

Due to rotting which could not be seen, the edge of the ramp gave way as the claimant crossed it, causing the claimant to fall and suffer injury. The claimant alleged a breach of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll