header-logo header-logo

06 February 2026 / Janet Carter
Issue: 8148 / Categories: Features , In Court , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Maintaining Magna Carta

241900

Janet Carter sets out how to retain ‘judgment by peers’ for all trials with a new plan

  • The government’s plan aims to bring about fair and faster justice for defendants and victims.
  • This article proposes using a specialist magistrates’ trial panel to slash the queue to enable faster jury trial for offences above 18 months’ custody.

With its plan to modernise the criminal courts and cut delays, the government’s end game is to reduce the court backlog and enable fair and faster justice for defendants and victims. Many of us desperately want to achieve this by retaining Magna Carta’s ‘judgment by peers’ by using juries and magistrates for all trials, alongside an increased efficiency in using every courtroom, every day. We can do this, but the plan needs to change.

Shortage of magistrates

One of the proposals in the plan is to maintain trial by peers by sitting two lay magistrates with a judge in an intermediate ‘swift court’ for cases between 18 months and 3 years. However, there is already a shortage of magistrates without creating yet another function.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll