header-logo header-logo

15 January 2025
Issue: 8100 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Magistrates request more creative options for sentencing

Magistrates have asked for more flexibility and creativity when sentencing convicted criminals, and urged the government not to abolish custodial terms of less than six months.

They also asked the government to recruit more probation officers, in their response last week to the government’s sentencing review, chaired by former Lord Chancellor David Gauke.

Mark Beattie, chair of the Magistrates’ Association (MA), said: ‘At the moment, within the existing sentencing framework, magistrates' options are limited to fines (which can be evaded) or custody when community options aren’t available or aren’t viable.

‘Magistrates should be able to apply other, practical alternatives to fines or custody, that would still be a deterrent to offenders while maintaining public confidence. For example, more use could be made of orders like driving disqualifications, travel restrictions, sexual harm prevention orders and football banning orders.

‘Reducing the current three-year minimum term for some of these orders could increase their applicability in these cases.’

Beattie warned the probation service is ‘under-staffed, resulting in significant delays to starting curfews, unpaid work orders and mental health treatment requirements (MHTR)’ while ‘weekend unpaid work placements—which are vital for those in full-time employment—are almost non-existent in many parts of the country’.

The MA response reports a case where an offender was given an MHTR as part of a suspended sentence but had to wait nearly six months for their first appointment, ‘was not able to access treatment in time and subsequently reoffended’. Other options ‘are so rigid that they are unworkable in the individual case’—for example, some programmes, such as ‘Building better relationships’, have waiting lists of more than 12 months.

More probation officers are therefore needed if more community sentencing is to be delivered.

The magistrates agreed short prison sentences are often counter-productive for many offenders and therefore should be treated as a last resort. However, they argued they are a useful deterrent for prolific shoplifters and offenders who refuse community options and should be retained.

Shabana Mahmood KC, the Lord Chancellor, was forced to release 1,100 prisoners early to ease overcrowding in October 2024, on the day she launched the Gauke review.

Issue: 8100 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll