header-logo header-logo

06 May 2022 / William Gibson
Issue: 7977 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Magic Circle mergers: taking a Chance

80850
William Gibson charts the history of the law firm merger & reflects on the bold move which started it all

Critics said it would never work. On 2 February 1987, an announcement was made which shocked the upper reaches of the legal profession. On 1 May that year, Coward Chance and Clifford-Turner were to merge to create Clifford Chance and the largest law firm in Britain. Mergers nowadays tend to be foretold and analysed in the legal press long before they happen, but this link had not attracted as much as a whisper—so the news had the effect of a bombshell.

To boldly go…

What was seen by many as an audacious move aroused considerable interest outside the firms, with many ‘management experts’ convinced the new giant would be at risk because lawyers weren’t necessarily good managers. Modern mergers attract professional help from experts from the outset, but in 1987 it was a question of making it up on the hoof.

35 years on, it would appear that something must have worked. At the time of writing, Clifford Chance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll