header-logo header-logo

03 October 2011
Issue: 7488 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

LSC overspend £51m on legal aid

National Audit Office criticises the Legal Services Commission's mistakes

The Legal Services Commission (LSC) has been criticised by auditors after it overpaid legal aid providers by more than £51m this year.

Applicants who were ineligible or whose eligibility could not be proven were paid £21.2m and £29.5m was wrongly paid out due to solicitors’ errors. The overpayment equates to just over two per cent of the LSC’s total expenditure.

This is the third year running that the National Audit Office (NAO) has qualified the Community Legal Service Fund and Criminal Defence Service accounts. Last year, the LSC overpaid by an even higher amount—£76.5m.

During the course of the year, the LSC recovered more than £7m of overpayments made to legal aid firms, 50% more than last year.

Amyas Morse, head of the NAO, says: “While the LSC has made considerable progress, it still faces difficulties in reducing the level of error in payments to legal services providers.”

On a more positive note, the LSC reduced its administration spend by 8.4%, funded more than 2.7 million “acts of assistance”, and beat its target to make one million legal help acts of assistance via face-to-face or telephone advice.

Sir Bill Callaghan, chairman of the LSC, says: “The NAO acknowledges that the LSC has made substantial improvements in reducing the amount of overpayments made to legal aid practitioners.

“To make further improvements that respond to the NAO’s recommendations, the LSC will continue to concentrate on strengthening its financial management through its internal financial stewardship programme.”

Law Society chief executive, Desmond Hudson, said: “The system remains too complex and susceptible to errors—all the more unacceptable when every possible penny should be spent on improving access to justice.”

Issue: 7488 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll