header-logo header-logo

11 September 2008
Issue: 7336 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-detail

LSC misses targets

Legal aid

In what was a “challenging year” the Legal Services Commission (LSC) achieved only 22 out of 35 key performance indicators, according to its annual report.

The report says that legal aid had funded more than 2.5m cases in the past year and maintained 100% coverage of the duty solicitor schemes. However, the report states that providers had failed to achieve targets in ensuring that all crime contracts had a peer review or quality assessment by 31 March this year and had not increased their satisfaction score by the target of 5%.

It was also reported that fixed fees for advocates, solicitors and counsel had not been introduced by April 2008 and that delays had affected the introduction of other fixed fee schemes.

The annual review did make clear, however, that the LSC had met its target of operating within the overall fund allocation for the year.

Issue: 7336 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll