header-logo header-logo

27 April 2007
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

LSC backs down in duty solicitor battle

The Legal Services Commission (LSC) has agreed to extend its consultation exercise on planned changes to the way duty solicitor slots are allocated following threats of legal action by the Law Society.

The society issued a pre-action protocol letter to the LSC challenging the way it is consulting on changes to the original plans to award duty solicitor slots to law firms as part of its market stability measures.

A society spokeswoman says that before Easter, the LSC decided to change the new basis for duty solicitor rota allocations for 2007–08. Having decided on one option for doing this in February, it then decided to propose an alternative option and planned to allow just two weeks to consult with representative bodies.

“Following pressure from the Law Society, the LSC has conceded that its recent proposal for a further, brief consultation on market stability measures was seriously flawed. It will now conduct a full and proper consultation on the matter,” she adds.
Derek Hill, director of the Criminal Defence Service at the LSC says: “In keeping with requests from the Law Society, we will be writing to providers to ask their opinion about methods to allocate duty slots up until October. Therefore, we are extending our current consultation exercise until 17 May.”

This means, he says, that until at least the end of June duty slots will continue to be allocated on the current rotas. The old duty solicitor arrangements will apply until then.

Meanwhile, the society claimed another victory last week when the government announced plans to retain the current small claims limits of £1,000 for personal injury and housing disrepair claims.

Society chief executive, Desmond Hudson, says: “I’m pleased the government has accepted the evidence in the Law Society’s ‘Fast and Fair’ campaign that an increase in the small claims limit for personal injury cases would deprive many people injured as a result of someone else’s negligence of compensation. We agree with the government that the right approach is to improve the process for dealing with lower value cases rather than depriving people of help from a solicitor.”

The government is also proposing an increase to the fast track limit to £25,000 and the introduction of a streamlined claims process for personal injury claims under £25,000.
 

Issue: 7270 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll