header-logo header-logo

14 August 2009
Issue: 7382 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

LSB lists fine potential

The Legal Services Board (LSB), the super-regulator which oversees the Law Society and Bar Council, has set a maximum potential fine of £28m for the Law Society if it does not reach its targets on complaints-handling.

The Bar Council could be fined up to £10m. The figure of £28m is reached by multiplying each of the 112,500 practising solicitors in England and Wales by £250. The LSB could also impose a fine of £10m, or a levy based on a rate of £5,000 per entity regulated.

The potential fines are set out in the LSB consultation paper, Compliance and Enforcement. However, the LSB acknowledges that “it would not be appropriate for a failure...to lead to that regulatory arm being further disadvantaged by a budgetary reduction”.

Russell Wallman, director of government relations at the Law Society, says: “The Legal Services Board’s proposals about maximum level of fines are misconceived.

They draw a false analogy between utility companies—which are commercial bodies operating for profit—and the regulation of legal services, which is a non-commercial activity carried out in the public interest. We will be responding fully to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll