header-logo header-logo

09 September 2016
Issue: 7713 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Low but multi

Where a low value road traffic personal injury claim exits the protocol with a CPR Part 7 claim which is allocated to the multi-track, do fixed recoverable costs apply?

If the exit was for a reason associated with the claimant’s default within CPR 45.24 (for example, acting unreasonably by exiting) then the defendant’s costs liability may be limited to fixed costs and allowable disbursements. Subject to this, while there is a fixed costs regime in place, it only applies to claims for no more than £25,000. Therefore, if the complexion of the claim has changed and it has been allocated to the multi-track on value grounds (over £25,000) then costs will be at large and the usual discretion will apply although an attempt could be made at the costs budgeting stage to limit the costs to fixed costs. If, however, the claim is for under £25,000 but has been allocated to the multi-track because of some complexity or allegation of fraud, we consider it is highly arguable that the fixed costs regime is still capable of applying.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll