header-logo header-logo

31 January 2008
Issue: 7306 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Low copy DNA evidence admissible in court

Low copy number DNA evidence will continue to be admissible in court, after a Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) review found noth­ing to suggest its use should be discontinued.

Last December, the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) recommended a suspension of low copy number DNA analysis in criminal cases after a judge in the trial of the alleged Omagh bomber expressed concern at the scientific validity and possi­bility of cross-contamination of the technique.

The CPS reviewed current cases involving the use of evidence gathered from very small samples of DNA and has recommended that low copy DNA analysis provided by the Forensic Science Service should “remain available as potentially admissible evidence”.

Gary Pugh, ACPO spokes­man and director of forensic services for the Metropolitan

Police, welcomed the CPS deci­sion, adding that “in accord­ance with existing guidance governing the potential use of DNA evidence, the strength and weight attached to this infor­mation should be considered, presented and tested in light of all other evidence available”. (See this issue, p 157.)

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll