header-logo header-logo

11 October 2013 / James Wilson
Issue: 7579 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Love thy neighbour...

108124983

James Wilson revisits the trail of Donoghue v Stevenson

One of the defining features of the common law is that it has developed not from complex rules delivered from on high, but rather from the courts recognising and enforcing private bargains voluntarily concluded by ordinary citizens. There can be no better example than Donoghue v Stevenson , perhaps the most recognisable civil case of all—certainly in respect of its imagery of a snail emerging from a ginger beer bottle. Just over 80 years after the House of Lords ruled on the case, it still features among the top 10 most viewed cases on most legal databases.

Snail tale

The story begins on 26 August 1928, when the recently divorced and reasonably indigent Mrs Donoghue entered the Wellmeadow Café in Paisley with a friend. The friend bought a drink for herself and a “ginger beer ice cream float” for Donoghue. The café’s owner, one Francis Minghella, poured some of the ginger beer over the ice cream to create the “float”. Donoghue drank some and her friend then poured the rest of the bottle into a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll