header-logo header-logo

13 March 2008 / David Burrows
Issue: 7312 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

A lost decade

Practitioners have been kept waiting for too long for improvements to the Family Proceedings Rules, says David Burrows

In 1995, Lord Woolf began a comprehensive review of civil courts’ procedures. His committee produced two wide-ranging sets of reports. The Civil Procedure Rules 1998 were made in consequence. These rules came into force on 1 April 1999, but did not at that stage apply to family proceedings (CPR 1998 r 2.2(1)). Nearly 10 years later, as a lawyer whose work is in mostly family proceedings, I still have—of necessity, and for occasional reference—my 1998 Green Book (containing County Court Rules 1981) and a 1999 White Book (Rules of the Supreme Court 1965). The Family Court Practice still reproduces parts of both sets of rules; and many family lawyers will probably only rarely have to look at the 1998 rules.

On 22 February 2008 the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) with Her Majesty’s Court Service produced Family Proceedings Rules: A new Procedural Code for Family Proceedings, a response to consultation CP(R) 19/06 . I fear, this document goes nowhere doing what its title suggests.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll