header-logo header-logo

A lost decade

13 March 2008 / David Burrows
Issue: 7312 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Practitioners have been kept waiting for too long for improvements to the Family Proceedings Rules, says David Burrows

In 1995, Lord Woolf began a comprehensive review of civil courts’ procedures. His committee produced two wide-ranging sets of reports. The Civil Procedure Rules 1998 were made in consequence. These rules came into force on 1 April 1999, but did not at that stage apply to family proceedings (CPR 1998 r 2.2(1)). Nearly 10 years later, as a lawyer whose work is in mostly family proceedings, I still have—of necessity, and for occasional reference—my 1998 Green Book (containing County Court Rules 1981) and a 1999 White Book (Rules of the Supreme Court 1965). The Family Court Practice still reproduces parts of both sets of rules; and many family lawyers will probably only rarely have to look at the 1998 rules.

On 22 February 2008 the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) with Her Majesty’s Court Service produced Family Proceedings Rules: A new Procedural Code for Family Proceedings, a response to consultation CP(R) 19/06 . I fear, this document goes nowhere doing what its title suggests.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll