header-logo header-logo

02 December 2016
Issue: 7726 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lord Chief Justice speaks out on career planning for judges

Judges are unlikely to hear the outcome of a review into their salaries until “into 2018”, the Lord Chief Justice has said.

Speaking at his annual press conference last week, Lord Thomas also backed more high-level career progression in the judiciary, including appraisal and career planning.

He said he doubted whether the Senior Salaries Review Body (SSRB) would report “until into 2018”.

“What we are looking for is an interim measure and then a proper examination,” he said.

“The last review which took place in 2011 was never implemented and this time I think there is a much greater all round, and I am very grateful to the chairman of the SSRB for this, he feels that really we must do a proper job and then do everything possible to implement the recommendations.”

On career progression, he noted that people are entering the judiciary in their late thirties and therefore the judiciary needed to explore what those people were interested in, “absolutely introduce appraisal” and introduce “some idea of career planning”.

“I am very anxious to make certain that whatever age, but particularly the young when they enter the judiciary, can see a variety of work,” he said.

“They may have started in a tribunal or started as a district judge and they may want to do different things and I think we ought to make that possible.”

Lord Thomas struck a cautious note on the danger of paid McKenzie Friends “preying on vulnerable people”.

“One has to bear in mind, and I have seen this both in crime and in immigration, that someone who is under threat of removal or is accused of a serious crime is extremely vulnerable and it is very easy for someone to say, ‘Come on, I can help you,’” he said.

“I have seen them [helping in immigration cases], who give legal advice that is simply wrong and you are preying on vulnerable people and that is why I am very, very cautious about payment to non-lawyers who try and assist vulnerable people. There is a real risk of exploitation or of giving advice the person wants to hear, not advice that they do not want to hear.”

Issue: 7726 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll