header-logo header-logo

15 February 2012
Issue: 7501 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lord Chancellor & judicial appointment

Lord Chancellor should follow JAC's lead on judicial appointment

The Lord Chancellor should keep out of the process of judicial appointment until names are advanced by the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC), human rights organisation Justice has said.

The Ministry of Justice consultation, Appointments and Diversity, published in November last year, proposed that the Lord Chancellor participate in the appointments process for a number of senior judicial roles. This would overturn the division of responsibilities established by the Constitutional Reform Act 2005.

Roger Smith, Justice’s director, said: “There has to be an appropriate and transparent division of responsibilities. The JAC should decide on a list of no more than three names of those who are suitable for appointment with an indication of who they prefer. At that point, the Lord Chancellor should choose.”

Issue: 7501 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll