header-logo header-logo

22 November 2007 / Tim Taylor
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Loosening the green belt?

Green belts may be back in the news but are they also back up for grabs? asks Tim Taylor

The status of green belts has been the subject of close scrutiny ever since their formal introduction into national planning policy in the Ministry of Housing and Local Government’s Circular 45 in 1954. And, despite vociferous claims to the contrary from a number of interest groups, it must be said that the present incumbent, Planning Policy Guidance Note 2 (PPG 2), could hardly be misread as a welcome sign for prospective developers. Indeed, many who have fallen flat on their faces at this hurdle will testify to this fact. In many ways, any developer wishing to enter the green belt with a spade in one hand and a drawing in the other still does so at his own risk.

MOUNTING PRESSURE

The announcement by the government in summer 2007 for the provision of three million new homes by 2020 has added to the pressure on the green belt and led to calls from concerned interest groups—such as the Campaign to Protect Rural England—for the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll