header-logo header-logo

17 April 2019
Issue: 7837 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Looking ahead to Brexit II

Future relationship will be even more complex than divorce

The government should avoid drawing red lines but should set out clear objectives ahead of the next phase of Brexit negotiations, a thinktank report has advised.

The UK must use the Art 50 extension to focus on its long-term relationship with the EU, according to the Institute for Government report, Negotiating Brexit: Preparing for talks on the UK’s future relationship with the EU, published this week.

Tim Durrant, lead author, said: ‘Negotiations on our future relationship with the EU will be much more complex than the divorce.

‘They will also set the context for the UK’s relationship with other countries for decades to come. It is vital that the government uses the next months to develop a better understanding of how the EU will approach the next phase.’

The report looks at what went right and what went wrong in negotiations so far, concluding that the main problems were political: Cabinet could not agree on the shape of the future economic relationship, and politicians, particularly on the government backbenches, did not trust the UK’s official negotiators.

It describes the decision to create a dedicated Brexit department, DExEU, ‘misguided’ as it caused tensions with No10. Moreover, the government engaged Parliament late, alienated the devolved governments, and failed to make use of external expertise. Meanwhile, its ‘divide and rule’ diplomatic strategy meant member states rallied behind the European Commission negotiators.

For the next phase of negotiations, the institute recommends that the prime minister appoint a ministerial deputy in the Cabinet Office to oversee the day-to-day negotiations, taking that role away from DExEU. It suggests the government make better use of the Department for International Trade, engage Parliament and the devolved administrations early and consistently, allow more outside input into its plans, and rethink its approach to engaging member states.

Issue: 7837 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll