header-logo header-logo

02 September 2010 / Tom Pangbourne , Julian Miller
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Features , Tax , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

Look both ways

Julian Miller & Tom Pangbourne assess the dangers of tax avoidance schemes

Claims against professional advisers in relation to their role in tax avoidance schemes are on the increase. This article examines the basis of such schemes, and why solicitors, barristers and other professionals involved in their implementation may be at risk.

Capital allowances tax reliefs

A number of capital allowance tax reliefs were introduced by the Labour government after 1997 which were designed to encourage investment in particular areas of British industry. This included investment in British films (under s 48 of the Finance (No 2) Act 1998), in technology start-ups (under
s 45 of the Capital Allowances Act 2001) and in research and development (under s 437 Capital Allowances Act 2001). Despite best intentions, inevitably this attracted not just those wishing to invest in the relevant sector but also high net worth individuals seeking to utilise the tax reliefs without any real interest in the underlying asset. This artificiality led to increased scrutiny by HMRC, the gradual restriction of the reliefs available, and the failure of several schemes.

Investment schemes

While

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll