header-logo header-logo

23 October 2008
Issue: 7342 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Long hours firms face talent shortfall in current climate

All work and no play culture upsetting work life balance for City law firm employees

City law firms need to reform their long hours culture or risk losing their competitive edge when recruiting the best talent.

New research, “Legal Lives: Retaining Talent through a Balanced Culture”, took place among fee-earners at 13 City law firms.

It identifies cultural barriers within law firms to balanced working, and recommends greater use of home and remote working. It found the perception that excellent client service is a barrier to balanced working is not reflected in reality, since clients are likely to support balanced working and recognise the benefits it brings.

Fee-earners who sought more balance wanted more control over non-work aspects of their lives but did not necessarily want to reduce their working hours.

Paul Lee, senior partner at Addleshaw Goddard, which commissioned the research with Working Families, says: “Work-life balance was, and continues to be, consistently identified as one of the most challenging issues affecting retention in the legal environment.”

Alison Pendleton, business director, Hays Legal, says: “From our point of view, it is one of the most important things.

Quality of work is the most important factor for candidates, and the next thing is work life balance. Salaries have gone up so much, even at a junior level, that money is no longer an issue, but people  want to know they will have a reasonable life.”

Candidates tend to migrate more commonly from large firms to smaller firms, where they can expect more flexibility, as opposed to moving in the other direction, she says.

“City firms say they are doing more, but in our experience they are still not keen on job-sharing or flexible working, unless it is a very valued member of the team.”

Issue: 7342 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll