header-logo header-logo

Long hours firms face talent shortfall in current climate

23 October 2008
Issue: 7342 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

All work and no play culture upsetting work life balance for City law firm employees

City law firms need to reform their long hours culture or risk losing their competitive edge when recruiting the best talent.

New research, “Legal Lives: Retaining Talent through a Balanced Culture”, took place among fee-earners at 13 City law firms.

It identifies cultural barriers within law firms to balanced working, and recommends greater use of home and remote working. It found the perception that excellent client service is a barrier to balanced working is not reflected in reality, since clients are likely to support balanced working and recognise the benefits it brings.

Fee-earners who sought more balance wanted more control over non-work aspects of their lives but did not necessarily want to reduce their working hours.

Paul Lee, senior partner at Addleshaw Goddard, which commissioned the research with Working Families, says: “Work-life balance was, and continues to be, consistently identified as one of the most challenging issues affecting retention in the legal environment.”

Alison Pendleton, business director, Hays Legal, says: “From our point of view, it is one of the most important things.

Quality of work is the most important factor for candidates, and the next thing is work life balance. Salaries have gone up so much, even at a junior level, that money is no longer an issue, but people  want to know they will have a reasonable life.”

Candidates tend to migrate more commonly from large firms to smaller firms, where they can expect more flexibility, as opposed to moving in the other direction, she says.

“City firms say they are doing more, but in our experience they are still not keen on job-sharing or flexible working, unless it is a very valued member of the team.”

Issue: 7342 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll