header-logo header-logo

11 December 2025
Categories: Legal News , Family , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Long hours, stress & unsustainable fees at the Family Bar

Family legal aid barristers are so overworked and underpaid that many would leave the sector ‘in a heartbeat’, according to a Bar Council report

The report, 'System overload: a report into family legal aid', published this week, is based on research with 100 family legal aid barristers. It portrays a group of dedicated practitioners routinely working 70-hour weeks yet sometimes struggling to pay their bills as the fees earned are worth approximately half of what they were in 1996.

One barrister who has worked in the area for more then ten years described how she made £7 per hour for a piece of work that took her 15 hours. Another barrister said working ‘more hours for less money’ was ‘the only way we can keep the show on the road, in other words to safeguard the children who are at the heart of everything we do’.

Courts often lack heating, wheelchair access, drinking water or sinks with working taps. According to one barrister, the ’terrible’ condition of the court estate ‘feels quite reflective of how people are feeling’.

Bar Council chair Barbara Mills KC said: ‘The people working within the system are collapsing and this cannot be ignored or tolerated.

‘The very real impact the financial and systemic pressure legal aid work is having on barristers’ health and wellbeing, made plain in this report, is extremely alarming. It is unacceptable that some family barristers are unable to support themselves and are being driven away from the profession at a time when legal aid representation is in desperate need.’

Mills called for an increase in legal aid rates, investment in the court estate and a government commitment to updating the fee schemes through an independent fee review body.

James Roberts KC, chair of the Family Law Bar Association, said the report ‘will make depressing reading for barristers working under the legal aid schemes but perhaps more importantly for their clients who are among the most vulnerable in our society.

‘Barristers in this field are effectively being paid half as much as they were in 1996 for twice the work. This is unsustainable.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll