header-logo header-logo

Locked up without trial

07 September 2020
Issue: 7901 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail
Plans to increase custody time limits from 182 to 238 days have prompted alarm among legal professionals

Lord Chancellor Robert Buckland unveiled the proposed two-month extension this week, as part of a package of measures to address the backlog of cases. It will apply to persons accused of offences due to be heard in the Crown court, is expected to come into force on 28 September and will remain in place for nine months.

However, legal rights group Justice hit back with a stern rebuke, pointing out that time limits can already be extended on an individual basis due to illness, absence, the need for separate trials or some other good reason, and that a Coronavirus Crisis Protocol for the Effective Handling of Custody time Limit Cases has been in place since April, with judges and prosecutors deciding each case on an individual basis.

Justice said, in a statement, that it was ‘therefore extremely concerned that this measure will create a blanket extension of detention for all those remanded in custody, irrespective of their circumstances.

‘The right to liberty is protected by Art 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights. This requires the question of whether continued detention is justified or necessary to be decided on the circumstances of each individual case.’

Justice suggested, instead, that fully remote jury trials be used, where all participants join via video, jurors joining together in a socially distanced hub, and with the hearing livestreamed to a virtual public gallery. It said it had tested this option and found it fair.

Justice director Andrea Coomber said extending time limits sent a message ‘government is not prioritising the administration of justice during this crisis’. 

Amanda Pinto QC, Chair of the Bar Council said: ‘We are very concerned that this 25% increase in the lawful detention of a potentially innocent person because there aren’t enough courts available to hear their trial does not become a license to push off cases for longer than absolutely necessary.’

Jury trials resumed in May but have been vastly reduced due to social distancing requirements. So far, ten temporary Nightingale courts have opened. 

Issue: 7901 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll