header-logo header-logo

09 June 2011 / Greg Wildisen
Issue: 7469 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Bribery
printer mail-detail

Locating the smoking gun

Organisations need to adapt their business processes to avoid breaching the Bribery Act, says Greg Wildisen

The Bribery Act 2010 will come into force on 1 July 2011. It is set to alter business practices for UK companies and individuals conducting business in the UK or overseas, and foreign companies with a presence in the UK. The Act introduces a general offence prohibiting active and passive bribery, a specific offence of bribing a foreign public official, and a corporate offence for commercial organisations for failing to prevent active bribery committed by their employees, agents or subsidiaries (the corporate offence).

Corporate offence defence

Pursuant to s 7(2) of the Act, it will be a defence to a corporate breach if an organisation can demonstrate that it has “adequate procedures” in place, designed to prevent persons associated with it from committing bribery. In accordance with s 9 of the Act, the Ministry of Justice has issued guidance upon what will constitute “adequate procedures” (30 March 2011). The Secretary of State summarises that: “The guidance is designed to be of general application and is formulated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll