header-logo header-logo

07 October 2010
Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Locating missing respondents

Government departments are becoming increasingly more unco-operative...

Government departments are becoming increasingly more unco-operative about assisting in the disclosure of addresses of “missing” respondents so as to facilitate service of matrimonial proceedings, even where financial and/or child care issues have to be determined. Letters to the Department for Work and Pensions seem to end up with HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) which says it will disclose nothing without a High Court order. What can be done about procuring help and from whom?

The arrangements for disclosure of addresses by government departments were agreed and set out in the Practice Direction (Disclosure of Addresses) [1989] 1 All ER 765, as amended (PD). However, most departments will not disclose information without a court order. The court may make an order for disclosure in cases falling within the terms of the PD or, in the case of a missing child, under the Family Law Act 1986, s 33, but not all departments will accept such an order as sufficient authority to disclose confidential information. In the case of HM Revenue and Customs, information can only be provided where the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
"There is no one who loves pain itself, who seeks after it and wants to have it, simply because it is pain..."
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
back-to-top-scroll