header-logo header-logo

23 February 2012
Issue: 7502 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Local government

R (on the application of the National Secular Society and another) v Bideford Town Council [2012] EWHC 175 (Admin), [2012] All ER (D) 79 (Feb)

Section 111 of the Local Government Act 1972 was the statutory expression of the powers implied by common law for corporations. Even if an act could have fallen into a category outside s 111 but for which no statutory authority was required at all, saying prayers would not have been one of them. That section required the prior identification of the function to which the acts in issue were incidental. The council had had no power to hold prayers as part of a formal council meeting, or to summon councillors to a meeting at which such prayers were on the agenda. Section 111 of the Act had not permitted the public saying of prayers as part of the formal meeting of the council as an incident of the transaction of its business.

On the evidence, it was clear that the saying of prayers took place, and was intended to take place, as part of the formal business of the council. There was no specific

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll