header-logo header-logo

LNB NEWS: SRA guidance updates and new warning notice published

The SRA has announced the publication of a range of new guidance covering the financial sanctions regime, immigration work and effective supervision. It has also issued a warning notice on involvement in strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs).

Lexis®Library update: The SRA’s new financial sanctions guidance is aimed at firms to ensure they understand their obligations under the financial sanctions regime and what they need to do to comply. It includes a comparison table setting out differences between the sanctions and AML regimes, guidance on controls firms should put in place, screening tools, what to do if a client is sanctioned, reporting obligations, licensing, and the interaction between reporting obligations and legal professional privilege. It also includes guidance on risk assessments, including a list of risk factors and a list of red flags for attempted circumvention of the sanctions regime.

The SRA’s new immigration guidance follows on from its recent thematic review of immigration and asylum work. It covers communications with clients, preparing properly for online hearings, and making it easier for clients to complain or give feedback. 

Effective supervision was one of the areas covered in the immigration thematic review and it is this that has triggered the SRA to produce separate overarching guidance on effective supervision applicable to all solicitors and firms that supervise individuals delivering legal services, including services that are provided by individuals not regulated by the SRA.

The SRA’s latest warning notice sets out the SRA’s expectations in relation to identifying proposed courses of action that could be characterised as SLAPPs, the sorts of behaviours that concern the SRA and that are likely to result in regulatory action and its expectations around the labelling or marking of correspondence. The warning notice is aimed at all SRA-regulated firms and individuals who conduct litigation or give dispute resolution and pre-action advice.

Sources:

• Sanctions regime guidance helps firms stay compliant

• Review looks at the competence of immigration service providers

• Solicitors warned about involvement in SLAPPs

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 28 November 2022 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll