header-logo header-logo

09 June 2023
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Pensions
printer mail-detail

LNB NEWS: MoJ publishes statement on CCM, McCloud remedy and Judicial Pension Scheme 2022

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has published a policy statement on the cost control mechanism (CCM) and how it will operate in the reformed Judicial Pension Scheme 2022 (JPS 2022), which follows HM Treasury’s update on the approach to the CCM in all public service pensions under the Public Service Pensions Act 2013.

Lexis®Library update: The MoJ states the employer cost cap for JPS 2022 will be calculated at the valuation with effective date of 31 March 2020, which will use the scheme data as at that date, and the assumptions used will be those that were in force at the 2012 valuation and also used to set the Judicial Pension Scheme 2015 (JPS 2015) employer cost cap.

The report notes that all judicial pension scheme services from 1 April 2022 onwards will be included in the CCM since it will be exclusively in JPS 2022. The MoJ adds that the retrospective McCloud remedy will operate over the period 1 April 2015–31 March 2022, and during this time the reformed scheme only design will also be used, so the CCM will only consider past and future service in the reformed schemes, with legacy scheme costs excluded. For the costs of service in JPS 2015 included in the reformed scheme only design, CCM will be considered together with service costs in JPS 2022, rather than separately.

HM Treasury’s paper on the CCM and reformed scheme only design can be located here.

The consultation response on the CCM in public service pensions can be found here.

The final report from on the Government Actuary’s Department on the CCM can be read here.

Source: MOJ statement on Cost Control Mechanism for Judicial Pension Scheme 2022

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 8 June 2023 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk

Categories: Legal News , Profession , Pensions
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll