header-logo header-logo

15 June 2021
Categories: Legal News , Pensions , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

LNB News: Home Office publishes updated guidance to progress immediate detriment cases

The Home Office has published updated technical notes that provide informal and non-statutory guidance on immediate detriment cases as part of the litigation in The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice v McCloud; The Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Welsh Ministers and Others v Sargeant [2018] EWCA Civ 2844 (the McCloud/Sargeant judgment). 

Lexis®Library update: The aim of the update is to support pension managers and practitioners with processing immediate detriment cases.

Police Pension Schemes

The updated technical note for the Police Pension Schemes provides guidance on processing certain immediate detriment cases ahead of legislation in order to address the age discrimination identified by the Court of Appeal in the McCloud/Sargeant judgment. Immediate detriment refers to those members who have already retired or will do so before the remedy to the discrimination is implemented. The update relates to existing informal and non-statutory guidance, originally issued in August 2020, and is intended to support police force pension managers and practitioners to administer certain immediate detriment cases (as defined). While the guidance is intended to provide informal advice, the Home Office warns that the overall responsibility for interpreting and applying the pension scheme regulations remains with each chief constable as the relevant scheme manager.

Fire Pension Schemes

A corresponding update has been prepared at the request of the Fire Brigades Union and the Firefighters’ Pensions (England) Scheme Advisory Board to assist employers with immediate detriment cases specific to members of the Fire Pension Schemes in relation to the Firefighters’ Pension Scheme. This notes that the guidance is informal and does not place any legal obligations on Fire and Rescue Authorities (FRAs). The guidance also notes that it should not be seen as providing a definitive resolution, but a tool used by FRAs to progress any immediate detriment cases. The guidance outlines that it should not be seen as providing a definitive resolution to all of the consequences arising from the discrimination, rather as a way to progress certain immediate detriment cases. The guidance is also to be kept under review as all the cases processed using the guidance will need to be revisited once the full detail of the government’s approach is finalised, and legislation is in place. Legislation is expected to be in place by October 2023.

Sources:

• Police pension schemes: Home Office informal immediate detriment guidance

• Firefighters’ Pension Schemes: Home Office Guidance on treatment of ‘Immediate Detriment’ cases

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 14 June 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

Categories: Legal News , Pensions , Regulatory
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll