header-logo header-logo

LNB News: Home Office publishes updated guidance to progress immediate detriment cases

15 June 2021
Categories: Legal News , Pensions , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
The Home Office has published updated technical notes that provide informal and non-statutory guidance on immediate detriment cases as part of the litigation in The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice v McCloud; The Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Welsh Ministers and Others v Sargeant [2018] EWCA Civ 2844 (the McCloud/Sargeant judgment). 

Lexis®Library update: The aim of the update is to support pension managers and practitioners with processing immediate detriment cases.

Police Pension Schemes

The updated technical note for the Police Pension Schemes provides guidance on processing certain immediate detriment cases ahead of legislation in order to address the age discrimination identified by the Court of Appeal in the McCloud/Sargeant judgment. Immediate detriment refers to those members who have already retired or will do so before the remedy to the discrimination is implemented. The update relates to existing informal and non-statutory guidance, originally issued in August 2020, and is intended to support police force pension managers and practitioners to administer certain immediate detriment cases (as defined). While the guidance is intended to provide informal advice, the Home Office warns that the overall responsibility for interpreting and applying the pension scheme regulations remains with each chief constable as the relevant scheme manager.

Fire Pension Schemes

A corresponding update has been prepared at the request of the Fire Brigades Union and the Firefighters’ Pensions (England) Scheme Advisory Board to assist employers with immediate detriment cases specific to members of the Fire Pension Schemes in relation to the Firefighters’ Pension Scheme. This notes that the guidance is informal and does not place any legal obligations on Fire and Rescue Authorities (FRAs). The guidance also notes that it should not be seen as providing a definitive resolution, but a tool used by FRAs to progress any immediate detriment cases. The guidance outlines that it should not be seen as providing a definitive resolution to all of the consequences arising from the discrimination, rather as a way to progress certain immediate detriment cases. The guidance is also to be kept under review as all the cases processed using the guidance will need to be revisited once the full detail of the government’s approach is finalised, and legislation is in place. Legislation is expected to be in place by October 2023.

Sources:

• Police pension schemes: Home Office informal immediate detriment guidance

• Firefighters’ Pension Schemes: Home Office Guidance on treatment of ‘Immediate Detriment’ cases

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 14 June 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

Categories: Legal News , Pensions , Regulatory
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll