header-logo header-logo

23 November 2018
Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Profession , Litigation trends
printer mail-detail

Litigators embrace change

julian_acratopulo_3

As Brexit disarray continues, lawyers need to embrace change to ensure the City retains its crown as the first choice for international disputes, the president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA) has said.  

Speaking at the LSLA annual dinner this week, Julian Acratopulo (pictured), who is also a partner at Clifford Chance, called on members to welcome the disclosure pilot, which is due to launch in the business and property courts on 1 January. It aims to find ways to cope with enormous growth in electronic data, which makes disclosure a lengthy and complicated process.

Acratopulo said: ‘The LSLA is encouraged by the amount of judge-led reform occurring in the sector and one example has been disclosure.

‘Whilst the London courts are preeminent, this is not a given for the future. It is the responsibility of all litigators to engage with the current reforms and provide their feedback.

‘Whilst the legal profession is not necessarily under immediate threat from digital innovation, artificial intelligence or robots, it is clear that competitive disruption remains a real and immediate risk. We need to make sure our system is match-fit for the 21st century, not least as our clients, the end users, are demanding it.’

Guest speaker Ian Forrester QC spoke about his perspectives on Brexit given his role as judge of the General Court of the EU.

Four out of five litigators thought the government should take action urgently, or very urgently, to protect London’s status as a pre-eminent litigation forum, in an LSLA survey in October. The majority thought there wold be a significant flight of work from London in the coming years.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll